Инфо За UK Новини Списание Обяви Продавалник Ипотеки Старт Строители Жълти страници Търси
Резултати от 1 до 22 от общо 22
  1. #1
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Oct 2004
    Град
    UK
    Мнения
    24
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране Ima izdadeni visi v UK...

    Zdraveite otnovo!
    Predi dve sedmici na moi poznat v London sa my izdali "Live to remain" sled 3 godi6na B.Visa. Moze bi triabva da se nadiavame,4e vsi4ko ste se opravi i ne6tata ste si doidat po mestata...
    Ako niakoi ima info i za drygi poly4eli ydulzenie tyk v UK,neka pi6e!!!
    "Zivotut e tryden,no puk interesen!"

  2. #2
    администратор Atanas Chikov Аватара на lordm
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Мнения
    21 361
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Помогни ни да се свържем с твоя познат, да говорим с него.
    Лицензиран имиграционен съветник Level 1 към OISC


    Станете членове на нашата Facebook група Работа в UK https://www.facebook.com/groups/908173225909681/

  3. #3
    Manchester United Fan Аватара на Zara
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Мнения
    15 416
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    leave to remain sled 3 g business visa ne mislia,che e ochakvanata visa. Vse pak - Leave to remain ili indefinite leave to remain????

  4. #4
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Nov 2004
    Мнения
    3
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    neznam kakvo se govori... no sled kato pro4etoh tuk, a iedna moia poznata mi kaza 4e sa zapo4nali da izdavat vizi, az re6ih da zvunna v home office dnes. Ot tam mi be6e odgovoreno 4e vse o6te izdavaneto na vizite e preustanoveno.Taka 4e ..... neznam na koe da viarvam.

  5. #5
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    Bristol
    Мнения
    63
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Zdr!
    Ne e vqrno, che Home Office ne davat vizi za bulgari! Moje bi samo biznes vizite sa pod zapor, no ne i drugite vidove vizi!

  6. #6
    Напреднал
    Регистриран на
    Dec 2004
    Мнения
    292
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Цитирай Първоначално написано от Marie
    Zdr!
    Ne e vqrno, che Home Office ne davat vizi za bulgari! Moje bi samo biznes vizite sa pod zapor, no ne i drugite vidove vizi!

    za ILR li govorish?
    neshto konkretno info li imash ili prosti si govorish ei taka...shtoto ne dade primer,ta da dadesh sila na postinga si...

  7. #7
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    Bristol
    Мнения
    63
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Zdr!
    Az si poluchih predi 3 sedmici pasporta ot Home office s bita viza za 2 godini - Limited Leave to remain. Nqma laja, nqma izmama! Ne e nito sluh!

  8. #8
    a/s/d
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    London
    Мнения
    906
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Цитирай Първоначално написано от Marie
    Zdr!
    Az si poluchih predi 3 sedmici pasporta ot Home office s bita viza za 2 godini - Limited Leave to remain. Nqma laja, nqma izmama! Ne e nito sluh!
    :)
    то за повече не ти трябва?

  9. #9
    Напреднал
    Регистриран на
    Feb 2005
    Мнения
    156
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране Kakva viza?

    Marie bi li spodelila za kakyv tip viza si chakala i si poluchila odobrenie?

    Blagodarja ti!

  10. #10
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    Bristol
    Мнения
    63
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Chestita Nova Godina!
    Znachi az doidoh predi godina i nqkolko meseca s rabotna viza, koqto mi izteche v sredata na noemvri 2004. V nachaloto na noemvri skluchihme brak s moq godenik, sled koeto az kandidatstvah kato Spouse. Vizata, koqto poluchih e za srok ot 2 godini - Limited Leave to Remain in the UK.
    Poluchih si vizata bez nikakvi problemi i intervuta!
    Mislq, che Home Office ne izdavat samo biznes vizi za bulgari, zashtoto moi bratovched poluchi rabotna viza sashto bez nikakvi problemi.
    Nadqvam se prez Novata Godina da se startita procedurata po biznes vizite.
    Mnogo uslivki, kasmet i uspeh ot men!

  11. #11
    Тониовата Майка Аватара на edin balgarin
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    London Гето UK
    Мнения
    4 269
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Цитирай Първоначално написано от Zara
    leave to remain sled 3 g business visa ne mislia,che e ochakvanata visa. Vse pak - Leave to remain ili indefinite leave to remain????
    Да наистина, би трябвало да е Indefinate.

  12. #12
    Напреднал
    Регистриран на
    Dec 2004
    Мнения
    292
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    mojebi v toq kazus,godenika e imal 3 godishna a tq rabotna.
    sled kato sa se ojenili i tq e stanala prika4ena kum negovata viza i e polu4ila ostatuka ot begovata trigodishna a imenno-2 godishna viza.
    li4no az se sumnqvam,4e na mqsto v UK mojesh da se prika4esh ot rabotna kum supose,n...nevedomi sa putishtata boji.
    devoikata koqto gi e pisala teq neshta znae nai dobre,ama tq e malko....
    kak da go kaja...razseqna i ne dava koi znae kolko detaili...

  13. #13
    Manchester United Fan Аватара на Zara
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Мнения
    15 416
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Spored men devoikata se e omajila za britanez i na basis braka poluchava 2 g limited leave to remain. Sled 2 g ste poluchi ILR...ako e oste jenena de.....

  14. #14

    Регистриран на
    Jan 1970
    Мнения
    0
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Eeeee mnogo ste re4nogledi de vednaga da opljuete momi4etoI na men ne mi stana qsno za kakav se e omajila ama neyse...makar 4e tova v slu4aq e mnogo vajno info .Skoro 4uh ot edna moq poznata kljuka v koqto se kazva 4e dori da se omajish za britanec i si sole trader si ostavash takav....zatvorili sa vrati4kta ......

  15. #15
    Напреднал
    Регистриран на
    Dec 2004
    Мнения
    292
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    az shte vkaram imoqta interpretaziq na slu4aq!
    malko shte se povtarqm,ama shte dam xod na moqta paranoq ot semi legal aliens:
    supruga kaza na zemqta s napulno neizqsnen statut,ina4e kazano AIA -absolutely illegal alien:


    vnedrqva se uspeshno v obshtestvoto,polu4ava statut na SLA ili semi legal alien:


    tq se vlubva v nego :



    i taq lubov rajda edin dve godishen ILR!!!!
    simple as that!

  16. #16
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Dec 2004
    Мнения
    36
    Post Thanks / Like

  17. #17
    Manchester United Fan Аватара на Zara
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Мнения
    15 416
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Sasto spored men Marie propuska da kaje kak taka poluchi tuk LLR as spouse,pri polojenie,che pon dopredi godini za spouse ili fiancee triabvashe da se vrastash zadaljitelno v BG .Ama mnogo vreme mina,mnogo voda izteche...moje i da sa promenili zakonite. Inache vsichki takiva tip visi za BG si se izdavat,samo business visi niama oste. Vchera moia priatelka si poluchi novia work permit s novata visa(pri smiana na employer) taka,che......visi si davat.

  18. #18
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Град
    Bristol
    Мнения
    63
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Zdr!
    Ne znaq kakva e bila procedurata za poluchavne na LLR as a spouse predi godini, no az kandidatsvah ot UK po reda i procedurata na HO. V tehnite instrukcii nikade ne pishe, che tqbva da se varna v BG i da kandidatstvam ot tam.
    Za viza kato godenica - da, naistina ne moje da se kandidatstva ot tuk, zadaljitelno e da e ot BG, pone taka mi otgovoriha na e-mail ot HO.
    A kak poluchih LLR as a spouse, pitate. Ami prosto pololnih neobhodimiq formulqr, prilojih neobhodimite dokumenti, koito se iziskvat ot HO i sled 4 sedmici si poluchih obratno pasporta s bita viza. Ne vijdam nishto neredovno v tova. Koito ima nqkakvi vaprosi moje da mi pusne lichno saobshtenie.
    Za tezi, koito me obvinqvat, che sam pusnala saobshtenieto ne na mqsto prosto iskam da im otgovorq, che ne sam celqla da sazdam panika i smut sred chakashte prodaljenie na buznes viza. Celta mi beshe da oprovergaq sluha, che ne se izdavat izobshto nikakvi vizi za bulgari tuk v UK kato davam za primer moq sluchai, a ne che sam chula ili prochela nqkade si tazi informaciq.
    Sajalqvam, ako tova e predizvikalo vedovolstvoto vi po povod na moqta informaciq.
    V kraina smetka se pitam struvashe li si izobshto da pusna vaprosnoto saobshtenie vav foruma. Taka che ne uprekvaite tezi, koito samo polzvat gotovata informaciq ot foruma bez da davat inf. :roll:

  19. #19
    Manchester United Fan Аватара на Zara
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Мнения
    15 416
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Iavno minalata godina sa promenili i tazi chast ot zakona. Pone predi ako imash brak skluchen v UK i ne si doshal s visa za fiancee ,za HO braka se okazvashe nevaliden i visa se vsemashe ot BG. Sega e drugo,a i LLR predi beshe za edna godina , a sega veche e za dve.

  20. #20
    Нов потребител
    Регистриран на
    Dec 2004
    Мнения
    36
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Pi40ve Guides ve4e ima taka 4e ne e 4udno da se razglezdat i Cases ve4e...

    Drug e vaprosa na kolko ste otkazvat ....

    http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind...ications.html?

    ECAA FURTHER AND INDEFINITE LEAVE TO REMAIN APPLICATIONS



    This guidance is for caseworkers considering applications from those who are in the UK under the provisions of an EC Association Agreement (ECAA) and are seeking Further Leave to Remain (FLR) or Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) under the same Agreement.

    General

    The requirements that the applicant must meet are set out in paragraphs 217-223 of the Immigration Rules. Paragraphs 220-221 relate to those who have spent less than four years continuously in the UK in the ECAA category and are applying for an extension of stay; paragraphs 222-223 relate to those who have spent four years continuously in this category and are seeking indefinite leave to remain.


    In all cases, the onus is on the applicant to demonstrate that he meets the requirements under the Rules. The easiest way for him to do this is to provide all the information requested in the ECAA (Main) application form, and for the documentation to be provided wherever possible in a recognisable format that is easily verifiable by the caseworker.

    Establishment of business

    All applicants must meet the requirements of paragraph 217(ia-iv). In order to demonstrate that 217(ia) is met, we would expect to see supporting documentation. Possible evidence to demonstrate this will depend on the sector in which the applicant is operating, but might include:
    Employers or Public Liability Insurance Certificate
    copies of contracts awarded to or by the applicant
    copy of the tax return (P35) for any staff that the applicant engages business rental documents for premises or equipment copies of invoices for work done or materials purchased. We would also expect to see sufficient testimony and verifiable references to support the claims made in the application about work that has been undertaken.


    There may be some applicants for FLR or ILR who for whatever reason were granted initial leave to remain under the ECAA without a valid entry clearance in this category (as required by 217(i)). These applications should be considered using this guidance in the normal way (but see "History of Application" section below).


    It is permissible for the applicant to be engaged in more than one business simultaneously.

    Maintenance and accommodation

    It is important for caseworkers to examine the particular circumstances of each individual case to establish to their satisfaction that 217(ii) is met. The income required for an applicant realistically to maintain and accommodate themselves and any dependants without recourse to employment or public funds should be assessed on a case by case basis, taking any relevant factors into account, and bearing in mind that income derived from sources other than businesses established in the UK under the terms of the Agreement should not be included. This includes anything earned by dependants of the primary applicant.


    Applicants need not have generated the level of profit required to maintain and accommodate themselves solely from the business that forms the basis of their ECAA application throughout the first year of their stay, while the business was being set up (although they must be able to demonstrate how, in the absence of such profits, they have maintained themselves in that time), but the caseworker must be satisfied that such a level can be generated consistently in the future in order for further leave to be granted. For those seeking indefinite leave to remain, the applicant should provide evidence that such profits have been generated for the full three years following their initial 12 months leave.


    Evidence of the level of income from the business should be demonstrated through the audited accounts required by paragraphs 218(vi), 219(v), and 222(iii) of the Rules, together with invoices and evidence of work undertaken that is in accordance with the original business plan and any other evidence submitted by the applicant. These accounts should also show expenditure on items crucial to the running of the business for the whole of the period in which it has been operative, such as essential equipment and travel costs. Evidence of personal expenditure should be provided through bank statements and documents relevant to significant expenditure such as tenancy agreements, utility bills, and Council Tax. "Audited accounts" in this context should be taken to mean accounts compiled by a fully qualified or chartered accountant. Checks should be undertaken where necessary to verify the professional status of these individuals.

    Employment status

    When considering whether an applicant has met the requirements of paragraphs 218 or 219, it is particularly important to consider whether the work on which the applicant has been engaged amounts to concealed employment. There is no statutory definition of self-employment, although previous decisions by the courts have established a number of criteria to distinguish between employment and self-employment. The kind of factors which need to be taken into account in deciding whether a particular engagement is one of employment or self-employment include:


    the degree of financial risk involved;
    the amount of control the worker has over what, when and how he / she does the work;
    the way in which pay is determined ? set fee or regular payment based on hourly/daily/weekly or monthly rates;
    whether the worker is required to work at the premises of the person worked for;
    whether the worker provides the services personally or has the right to send someone else in his/her place.

    The common thread running through these indicators is that no single factor is conclusive; for each engagement the whole picture needs to be looked at in the light of all the facts.


    The applicant, or the person who is engaging him, cannot simply choose that an engagement is one of self-employment. It will depend on the terms, conditions and facts of the relevant working engagement. The fact that someone has registered to pay tax and National Insurance contributions as a self-employed person with the Inland Revenue is not sufficient evidence that they are truly self employed as the system is one of self assessment.


    If 'yes' can be answered to all of the following questions, it will usually mean they are not self-employed.

    Will the person have to do the work themselves?

    Can someone tell the person at any time what to do, where to carry out the work or when and how to do it?

    Will the person work a set amount of hours?

    Can someone move the person from task to task?

    Will the person be paid by the hour, week, or month?

    Can the person get overtime pay or bonus payment?

    However any combination of some of these factors might also indicate employment.


    If 'yes' can be answered to all of the following questions, it will usually mean they are self-employed.

    Can the person hire someone to do the work for him/her or engage helpers at his/her own expense?

    Will the person risk his/her own money?

    Will the person provide the main items of equipment they need to do their job (not just small tools many employees provide for themselves)?

    Will the person agree to do the job for a fixed price regardless of how long the job may take?

    Will the person be able to decide what work to do, how and when to do the work and where to provide the services?

    Can the person regularly work for a number of different people?

    Will the national have to correct unsatisfactory work in their own time at their own expense?

    Again, any combination of these factors might also indicate self-employment.


    Broadly, someone is self-employed if they can demonstrate that they are in business on their own account and bear the responsibility for the success or failure of that business.

    Consideration and verification procedures

    Caseworkers should seek to verify key aspects of the application wherever practicable through the checking of references and documents, and confirmation of any relevant agreements and business activities. In some cases it may not be possible to establish, solely on the basis of the documents available to the caseworker, the true nature of the circumstances surrounding the application with sufficient confidence to allow an informed and reasonable judgement to be made. This may be due to doubts about the authenticity of documents, apparent inconsistencies in the evidence submitted, or significant omissions which seem unlikely merely to be a result of oversights in the preparation of the application. In these cases, consideration should be given to interviewing the applicant in person before making a decision in order to explore further the areas of doubt, and to contribute to the overall assessment of the application. There may also be cases where the application has been submitted by a third party and it would be helpful to test the credibility of the claims being made on their behalf through a face to face interview with the applicant. This may especially be so if a number of similar applications have been made by the same representative on behalf of different clients.

    History of application

    Although each application should be considered on the basis of current circumstances, the circumstances surrounding the original grant of entry clearance or further leave to remain for these applicants should be checked. If a caseworker feels that, for whatever reason, any particular aspect of the case was not examined sufficiently at the time of any previous decision, it would be appropriate for it to be looked at it in more detail now, if it was felt that such examination would help to inform the decision on the current application. Such checks may also help the caseworker to form a judgement regarding the overall credibility of the application.


    In this context, previous immigration history may be taken into account, and may point towards further investigation and exploration of particular aspects of the application. But a "negative" history, including previous unlawful presence in the UK, cannot, in itself, be conclusive in refusing an application.

    Length of extension of stay

    Paragraph 220 of the Immigration Rules states that extensions of stay other than indefinite leave to remain should be for a period not exceeding three years. In unexceptional cases, further leave should be granted for three years. However there may be cases which do not merit refusal outright, but where there may be some doubt as to whether the applicant will be able to meet the requirements of the Rules for a full three year period. This may particularly be the case where the applicant has established himself during the initial 12 months leave, but there has been insufficient time since that point to generate enough evidence for the removal of such doubt. In these cases it may be appropriate to grant an extension of stay for less than three full years, and for the applicant to be required to apply again for a further extension at the end of that period of leave.

    Forgery / falsification

    Caseworkers should be aware of all current guidance regarding forgery and falsification of relevant documentation, and should take expert advice, whether locally or elsewhere, whenever there is doubt regarding a document submitted as evidence.

  21. #21
    Старо куче Аватара на iva
    Регистриран на
    Jan 2005
    Мнения
    1 525
    Post Thanks / Like

    По подразбиране

    Цитирай Първоначално написано от Marie
    Zdr!
    V kraina smetka se pitam struvashe li si izobshto da pusna vaprosnoto saobshtenie vav foruma. Taka che ne uprekvaite tezi, koito samo polzvat gotovata informaciq ot foruma bez da davat inf. :roll:

    Marie, съжелявам че сме те огорчили.
    Зная че си искала да помогнеш с тази информация и ти благодаря за това.
    ...И да разбира се че си струва .Всяка тема дава по някаква полезна информация.Твоята също.
    Моля те, не преставай да пишеш


    Господи, удостой ме да съм оръдие
    на Твоя мир!
    Да нося вярата там, където се съмняват,
    Надеждата, където се отчайват,
    Радостта, където страдат,
    Любов, където ненавиждат.
    Да нося истината там, където се заблуждават,
    Светлина – в тъмнината.
    Господи, удостой ме!
    Да утешавам, а не да очаквам утешение,
    да разбирам, а не да очаквам разбиране,
    да обичам, а не да очаквам любов...

    (Молитва на св. Франциск)

  22. #22
    Annapiano
    Guest

    По подразбиране

    Ha-ha, tova poslednoto beshe dobre...!Bravo!

Информация за темата

Потребители разглеждащи тази тема

В момента има 1 потребител(и) разглеждащ(и) тази тема. (0 регистрирани и 1 гости)

Отметки

Правила за публикуване

  • Вие не можете да публикувате теми
  • Вие не можете да отговаряте в теми
  • Вие не можете да прикачвате файлове
  • Вие не можете да редактирате мненията си
  •  
Top Worktops
eXTReMe Tracker